golfclubase
日本語

PING i240 Irons vs Titleist T150 Irons

Mid Handicapper or Scratch Player?

PING i240 Irons

PING

i240 Irons

2025 model

Release date
—
MSRP at launch
—
i240 Irons details →
Titleist T150 Irons

Titleist

T150 Irons

2025 model

Release date
Aug 21, 2025
MSRP at launch
$215.00 (per club)
T150 Irons details →

Which to choose

The biggest difference is who each iron is built for. The PING i240 is a cast cavity-back aimed at mid-to-low handicappers (roughly 14 and below). Testers found it more forgiving and consistent than its compact head suggests, and said fades and draws come easily. The forged Titleist T150 aims at low single-figure to scratch players. It gives a little more help than the T100 on small to medium mishits, but it isn't built for golfers who miss all over the face.

Looks split opinion more on the i240, while testers agreed the T150 has a clean, traditional look. The T150's 7-iron is slightly stronger at 32° against 33°. Neither is described as a long iron.

Choose the i240 Irons if…

you're a mid-to-low handicapper (around 14 and below) who wants a compact players' shape with extra forgiveness, along with easy launch from the long irons.

Choose the T150 Irons if…

you're a low single-figure to scratch player who wants a forged iron with a clean, traditional look and clear feedback on where you struck the ball, possibly blended with the T250 in a combo set.

Common questions

Which is more forgiving?
The i240 is pitched at a wider range of players, and testers found it more forgiving than its compact head suggests. The T150 only helps on small to medium mishits and isn't meant for golfers who miss all over the face.
Which one goes farther?
Neither is a distance iron. The i240 gives little or no gain over the i230. Testers are split on the T150: some credit its slightly stronger lofts (32° 7-iron against the i240's 33°) with extra pace, while others call its distance modest.
Is the T150 worth upgrading to from the 2023 version?
Testers describe the 2025 T150 as only a modest update over the 2023 model.

Written by golfclubase with AI from our summaries of published reviews and test videos and the makers' published specs (Oct 25, 2026).

Side by Side, Aspect by Aspect

Feel and Sound: Soft Cast vs Soft Forged

Reviewers praised the i240's feel. They called it smooth, solid and soft for a cast iron, and one tester said even mishits felt good on the hands. One reviewer found the feel very similar to previous Ping generations. Its sound was described as solid and crisp, and one reviewer heard a quiet thud on pure strikes and a click on thin ones. Reviewers also praised the forged T150 for a soft, solid feel with clear feedback, and one tester rated its feel 10 out of 10. One reviewer warned that its softer, less springy response may take some getting used to. One reviewer called its sound quiet, and another found it slightly livelier than the T100. Both score well here, but the T150's feedback comes from a fully forged head.

Launch and Spin: Both Fly High, Spin Views Vary

Most reviewers reported a higher launch from the i240. In one testing video, a 4-iron cleared trees the tester wouldn't normally try to carry. Another video found its launch about the same as the i210 and i230. Opinions on spin were split. Several reviewers found it above average and credited the fewer, wider grooves, but one found it relatively low in the mid-irons. The T150 also flew higher than testers were used to, and one tester said its steep descent was ideal for holding greens. Most testers who covered spin found plenty of it, but in one video it spun less than a Callaway comparison iron. Both are high-flying players' irons, and spin results for each depended on the test.

Forgiveness: The i240 Gets More Credit

One reviewer found the i240 noticeably more forgiving than the i230, with tighter dispersion. Another noted tight front-to-back dispersion even on mishits. One reviewer said it gave the most predictable results in the players category but was less forgiving than the G440. Another tester felt the forgiveness was real but said it won't fix a poor swing. Reviewers judged the T150 against Titleist's own range. They found it somewhat more forgiving than the T100 but less forgiving than the T250 or T350. In one testing video, a poor strike lost only a little carry and dispersion stayed acceptable. Testers described the i240 as forgiving in its own right, while they mostly described the T150's help in relation to the T100.

Looks at Address: Opinions Split on the i240

Several reviewers liked the i240's compact, clean shape with a thin topline and modest offset (0.09 in at the 7-iron). One likened it to a blend of the i210 and Blueprint S, and another placed it between the G440 and Blueprint. Opinions were split, though. One reviewer called it plainer than the i230, with a thicker topline in the long irons, and another felt the carbon-style back looks busier and could date sooner. Reviewers described the T150 as clean, compact and traditional, with a thin topline and minimal offset, slightly larger than the T100. One tester rated its looks 9.5 out of 10 and said it looks very similar to the T250 from the topline, which makes it easy to blend in a combo set. The i240 split opinion, while comments on the T150 were largely positive.

Written by golfclubase with AI from what review articles and test videos said about each model, aspect by aspect (Oct 25, 2026).

Key differences

  • Loft: the T150 Irons is 1° lower than the i240 Irons
  • Lie angle: the T150 Irons is 1° higher than the i240 Irons

Specs side by side

i240 Irons: 7I; T150 Irons: 7I (US models).

i240 IronsT150 Irons
Loft33°32°−1°
Lie angle62°63°+1°
Offset2.3 mm—
Construction—Forged
Iron typeCavity back—
Club length37″37″
Swing weightD1—

Values are as published by the makers. Sources are listed on each model's page.

The Numbers, Visualized

Where They Sit Among Irons

Compared with the reference club of every model in Irons on golfclubase (US specs; 7I / 7I). The line is the full range, the band the middle half, the tick the median.

Lofti240 Irons 33°/T150 Irons 32°
27°35°

i240 Irons ranks #13 highest of 107. T150 Irons ranks #26 highest of 107.

Lie anglei240 Irons 62°/T150 Irons 63°
61.5°63.5°

i240 Irons ranks #2 lowest of 107. T150 Irons ranks #2 highest of 107.

Offseti240 Irons 2.3 mm
1.5 mm6.9 mm

i240 Irons ranks #10 smallest of 70.

Club lengthi240 Irons 37″/T150 Irons 37″
36.25″37.5″

Both rank #9 shortest of 106.

Swing weighti240 Irons D1
B8D3

i240 Irons ranks #26 heaviest of 68.

Loft by Clubi240 IronsT150 Irons
19°34.5°50°3I4I5I6I7I8I9IPWUW48W
Length by Clubi240 IronsT150 Irons
35.50″37.25″39.00″3I4I5I6I7I8I9IPWUWW

What reviewers say

i240 Irons

What reviewers like

  • Soft, solid feel for a cast iron, even on mishits
  • Easy, high launch, especially from the long irons
  • Forgiving and consistent for such a compact head
  • Healthy spin that helps hold greens
  • Easy to shape fades and draws and control trajectory

Watch out for

  • Little or no distance gain over the i230
  • Not a long iron compared with distance-focused sets
  • Expensive at launch
Full overview of the i240 Irons →

T150 Irons

What reviewers like

  • Soft, solid forged feel with clear feedback on strike location
  • Clean, compact players' look with a thin topline and minimal offset
  • High flight with a steep descent that holds greens
  • Plenty of spin for control on approach shots
  • More help on mild mishits than the T100

Watch out for

  • Much less forgiving than the T250 or T350 for inconsistent strikers
  • Only a modest update over the 2023 version
  • Soft feel may take getting used to if you play hotter irons
Full overview of the T150 Irons →

Lofts and clubs offered

i240 Irons
3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW / UW
T150 Irons
3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW / W / 48
Set makeup: 3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW / W

More comparisons