golfclubase

PING Blueprint S Irons vs i240 Irons

Strike Feedback or Easy Launch?

PING Blueprint S Irons

PING

Blueprint S Irons

2024 model

Release date
Jan 25, 2024
MSRP at launch
—
Blueprint S Irons details →
PING i240 Irons

PING

i240 Irons

2025 model

Release date
—
MSRP at launch
—
i240 Irons details →

Which to choose

The biggest difference is construction and how easily each one launches. The Blueprint S is forged and sits just below PING's blade-style Blueprint T. Its long irons may launch lower, and reviewers suggest looking at hybrids in a fitting. The i240 is a cast cavity-back that testers found launches higher than its size suggests, with long irons that get airborne easily.

Both feel soft and solid from the centre. On the i240 that feel holds up even on mishits, while heel and toe strikes on the Blueprint S feel and sound noticeably harsher. Reviewers widely praise the Blueprint S as one of PING's best-looking irons, but opinions on the i240's looks are split. At 33° and 37 inches in the 7-iron, the i240 has slightly more offset (0.09 vs 0.08 inches) and bounce (9° vs 8°).

Choose the Blueprint S Irons if…

you're a low-to-mid handicapper or skilled ball striker who wants a forged iron with a compact, minimal-offset look and clear strike feedback, and you're open to blending in hybrids or i230 long irons.

Choose the i240 Irons if…

you play off roughly 14 or below and want a compact players' shape that keeps its soft feel on mishits and launches the long irons high and easily.

Common questions

Which launches higher?
The i240. Testers found it launches higher than expected, especially in the long irons, while the Blueprint S's long irons may launch lower and reviewers disagree on its overall flight.
Which feels better on mishits?
The i240 keeps a soft, solid feel even on off-centre strikes. On the Blueprint S, heel and toe strikes feel and sound noticeably harsher.
Is either one long?
Neither is a distance iron. The i240 gives little or no gain over the i230, and some testers found the Blueprint S shorter than their current irons.

Written by golfclubase with AI from our summaries of published reviews and test videos and the makers' published specs (Oct 25, 2026).

Key differences

  • Offset: the i240 Irons is 0.3 mm larger than the Blueprint S Irons
  • Swing weight: the i240 Irons is 1 pt lighter than the Blueprint S Irons

Specs side by side

Blueprint S Irons: 7I; i240 Irons: 7I (US models).

Blueprint S Ironsi240 Irons
Loft33°33°
Lie angle62°62°
Offset2 mm2.3 mm+0.3 mm
ConstructionForged—
Iron type—Cavity back
Club length37″37″
Swing weightD2D1−1 pt

Values are as published by the makers. Sources are listed on each model's page.

The Numbers, Visualized

Where They Sit Among Irons

Compared with the reference club of every model in Irons on golfclubase (US specs; 7I / 7I). The line is the full range, the band the middle half, the tick the median.

LoftBlueprint S Irons 33°/i240 Irons 33°
27°35°

Both rank #13 highest of 107.

Lie angleBlueprint S Irons 62°/i240 Irons 62°
61.5°63.5°

Both rank #2 lowest of 107.

OffsetBlueprint S Irons 2 mm/i240 Irons 2.3 mm
1.5 mm6.9 mm

Blueprint S Irons ranks #6 smallest of 70. i240 Irons ranks #10 smallest of 70.

Club lengthBlueprint S Irons 37″/i240 Irons 37″
36.25″37.5″

Both rank #9 shortest of 106.

Swing weightBlueprint S Irons D2/i240 Irons D1
B8D3

Blueprint S Irons ranks #9 heaviest of 68. i240 Irons ranks #26 heaviest of 68.

Loft by ClubBlueprint S Ironsi240 Irons
19°34.5°50°3I4I5I6I7I8I9IPWUW
Length by ClubBlueprint S Ironsi240 Irons
35.50″37.25″39.00″3I4I5I6I7I8I9IPWUW

What reviewers say

Blueprint S Irons

What reviewers like

  • Compact, clean look at address with minimal offset and a thin topline
  • Soft, solid feel from the centre with clear strike feedback
  • Easy to shape the ball both ways and control trajectory
  • Reliable stopping power on approach shots
  • More forgiving on mis-hits than its size suggests

Watch out for

  • Heel and toe strikes feel and sound noticeably harsher
  • Chrome strip near the sole won't suit every eye
  • Long irons may launch lower; consider hybrids during fitting
  • Premium price per club
Full overview of the Blueprint S Irons →

i240 Irons

What reviewers like

  • Soft, solid feel for a cast iron, even on mishits
  • Easy, high launch, especially from the long irons
  • Forgiving and consistent for such a compact head
  • Healthy spin that helps hold greens
  • Easy to shape fades and draws and control trajectory

Watch out for

  • Little or no distance gain over the i230
  • Not a long iron compared with distance-focused sets
  • Expensive at launch
Full overview of the i240 Irons →

Lofts and clubs offered

Blueprint S Irons
3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW
i240 Irons
3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW / UW

More comparisons