The biggest difference is how much help each gives on mishits. Reviewers agree the PING Blueprint S is more forgiving than its compact shape suggests, and they pitch it at low-to-mid handicappers. Opinion on the TaylorMade P·7CB is split: most testers found it kinder than its size suggests, but others called it unforgiving, and it's aimed at low-handicap, single-figure players.
The two are close on specs, with the same 33° 7-iron loft and 37-inch length. The P·7CB has a slightly more upright lie (62.5° vs 62°). Both are easy to shape. The P·7CB is praised for consistent, repeatable spin and flight. Testers disagree on the Blueprint S's distance and launch, so a fitting matters more with it.
Choose the Blueprint S Irons if…
you're a low-to-mid handicapper who wants a compact forged iron that reviewers agree gives more help on off-centre strikes than its looks suggest, with the option to blend in something like the i230 in the long irons.
Choose the P·7CB Irons if…
you're a consistent single-figure ball striker who values repeatable spin and flight over distance, and you're happy to pair it with P770 long irons if they're hard to launch.
Common questions
- Which is more forgiving?
- Reviewers agree the Blueprint S is more forgiving on mishits than its size suggests. Testers split on the P·7CB: most found it kinder than expected, but others said mishits clearly lose distance and direction.
- Which launches higher?
- Testers describe the P·7CB's flight as mid to mid-high. Reports on the Blueprint S range from medium to high, so check it in a fitting. Reviewers say the long irons of both can launch low.
- What should I use in the long irons?
- For the Blueprint S, reviewers suggest hybrids or blending in an iron like the i230. For the P·7CB, many suggest a combo set with the P770.
Written by golfclubase with AI from our summaries of published reviews and test videos and the makers' published specs (Oct 25, 2026).