golfclubase

PING i230 Irons vs Blueprint S Irons

Mishit Help or Shot-Shaping Freedom?

PING i230 Irons

PING

i230 Irons

2023 model

Release date
Oct 25, 2022
MSRP at launch
—
i230 Irons details →
PING Blueprint S Irons

PING

Blueprint S Irons

2024 model

Release date
Jan 25, 2024
MSRP at launch
—
Blueprint S Irons details →

Which to choose

The biggest difference is how much help each iron gives. The i230 is a cast cavity-back that testers found more forgiving than a typical players' iron. Off-centre hits hold their line, and the flight tends to be high and fairly straight. The forged Blueprint S puts shot-shaping and trajectory control first. It has a thin topline and slightly less offset (0.08 vs 0.09 inches at the 7-iron).

Both feel soft and solid from the centre. Testers describe a quiet, muted sound on the i230. On the Blueprint S, heel and toe strikes feel and sound noticeably harsher, so it tells you clearly where you made contact. Testers were split on distance for both irons, so a fitting is worth it either way.

Choose the i230 Irons if…

you're a single-figure to about 15 handicapper who wants a players' iron that feels close to forged but forgives mishits, with a high, fairly straight flight.

Choose the Blueprint S Irons if…

you're a skilled ball striker who wants a forged iron with minimal offset that is easy to shape both ways, and you don't mind harsher feedback when you miss the centre.

Common questions

Which is more forgiving?
The i230. Testers found it more forgiving than most players' irons. The Blueprint S gives more help than its blade-like shape suggests, but it is still a players' iron.
Which is better for shaping shots?
The Blueprint S. Reviewers agree it is easy to shape both ways and to control trajectory. The i230 can be shaped too, but its flight tends to be high and fairly straight, and misses usually go right.
Can I combine the two in one set?
Yes. The Blueprint S overview suggests higher handicappers blend it with something like the i230 in the long irons, where the Blueprint S may launch lower.

Written by golfclubase with AI from our summaries of published reviews and test videos and the makers' published specs (Oct 25, 2026).

Side by Side, Aspect by Aspect

Forgiveness: The i230 Gives More Help

Reviewers rated the i230 well for forgiveness, and one found it more forgiving than expected for a players' iron. One testing video ranked it among the most forgiving players irons tested, saying off-centre strikes kept their distance and direction. Opinions on the Blueprint S were split. One reviewer said mis-hits are punished. Another said it adds extra forgiveness for a low-handicap audience, with mis-hits still feeling solid, and one testing video called it surprisingly forgiving. A second video found it more forgiving than expected for a forged cavity back but wanted a little more help. The i230 earned stronger marks, and one reviewer who tested both rated the Blueprint S lower.

Launch and Spin: The i230 Flies Higher

High flight came up again and again with the i230. Two reviewers found it too high and hard to keep down into the wind. Others liked how easily it got airborne, and one testing video said it could still be flighted low. Reviewers said it spins a lot: one praised its spin control and stopping power, and a testing video said it retained plenty of spin. The Blueprint S drew more mixed launch comments. One reviewer called it a controlled, medium launch with average spin. One testing video saw a high, consistent flight that dropped off somewhat in the long irons. Two reviewers praised its stopping power. The i230 was described as high-flying more often, sometimes as a drawback.

Feel and Sound: Soft Centres on Both

Reviewers praised the i230's feel as soft, solid and cushioned. One testing video said it felt close to forged even on mishits, and a fitter in another video said it could pass for forged. Its sound was described as muted and less clicky than the model it replaces. One testing video called it the best-sounding set of Ping irons the team had tested. The Blueprint S also got strong feel ratings: one reviewer called it among the nicest-feeling Ping irons, soft and forged-like from the centre. Two reviewers and a testing video said off-centre strikes turn sharper or more clicky. Both feel soft from the middle, but reviewers noted the Blueprint S changes more when you miss the centre.

Shot Shape: Blueprint S Rewards Shaping

Reviewers mostly described the i230 as straight. One reviewer found its flight neutral to straight. One testing video said fades and draws were easy to hit, but the ball wanted to fly straight on most shots. Another reviewer's misses went mostly right. For the Blueprint S, shaping was the theme. One reviewer said they could shape the ball on command, and one testing video said skilled players can hit high or low flights and curve it both ways easily. Another reviewer saw a consistent, gentle draw. Its offset is also slightly smaller at the 7-iron: 0.08 inches against the i230's 0.09 inches. Both can be shaped, but reviewers put more emphasis on workability with the Blueprint S.

Written by golfclubase with AI from what review articles and test videos said about each model, aspect by aspect (Oct 25, 2026).

Key differences

  • Offset: the Blueprint S Irons is 0.3 mm smaller than the i230 Irons
  • Swing weight: the Blueprint S Irons is 1 pt heavier than the i230 Irons

Specs side by side

i230 Irons: 7I; Blueprint S Irons: 7I (US models).

i230 IronsBlueprint S Irons
Loft33°33°
Lie angle62°62°
Offset2.3 mm2 mm−0.3 mm
Construction—Forged
Club length37″37″
Swing weightD1D2+1 pt

Values are as published by the makers. Sources are listed on each model's page.

The Numbers, Visualized

Where They Sit Among Irons

Compared with the reference club of every model in Irons on golfclubase (US specs; 7I / 7I). The line is the full range, the band the middle half, the tick the median.

Lofti230 Irons 33°/Blueprint S Irons 33°
27°35°

Both rank #13 highest of 107.

Lie anglei230 Irons 62°/Blueprint S Irons 62°
61.5°63.5°

Both rank #2 lowest of 107.

Offseti230 Irons 2.3 mm/Blueprint S Irons 2 mm
1.5 mm6.9 mm

i230 Irons ranks #10 smallest of 70. Blueprint S Irons ranks #6 smallest of 70.

Club lengthi230 Irons 37″/Blueprint S Irons 37″
36.25″37.5″

Both rank #9 shortest of 106.

Swing weighti230 Irons D1/Blueprint S Irons D2
B8D3

i230 Irons ranks #26 heaviest of 68. Blueprint S Irons ranks #9 heaviest of 68.

Loft by Clubi230 IronsBlueprint S Irons
19°34.5°50°3I4I5I6I7I8I9IPWUW
Length by Clubi230 IronsBlueprint S Irons
35.50″37.25″39.00″3I4I5I6I7I8I9IPWUW

What reviewers say

i230 Irons

What reviewers like

  • Soft, solid feel that some compare to a forged iron
  • Quiet, muted sound at impact
  • Clean, minimal looks with a compact, confidence-inspiring head
  • More forgiveness on mishits than most players' irons
  • Plenty of spin for stopping power into greens

Watch out for

  • Offset is more noticeable in the long irons
  • Cast heads are harder to adjust for lie and loft
  • Soles are thicker than on some rival players' irons
Full overview of the i230 Irons →

Blueprint S Irons

What reviewers like

  • Compact, clean look at address with minimal offset and a thin topline
  • Soft, solid feel from the centre with clear strike feedback
  • Easy to shape the ball both ways and control trajectory
  • Reliable stopping power on approach shots
  • More forgiving on mis-hits than its size suggests

Watch out for

  • Heel and toe strikes feel and sound noticeably harsher
  • Chrome strip near the sole won't suit every eye
  • Long irons may launch lower; consider hybrids during fitting
  • Premium price per club
Full overview of the Blueprint S Irons →

Lofts and clubs offered

i230 Irons
3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW / UW
Blueprint S Irons
3I / 4I / 5I / 6I / 7I / 8I / 9I / PW

More comparisons